Egyptian and Indian Traditions for Constructing a Sacred Image such as The Great Ephesian Artemis

1    Identify specific metaphysical considerations.
2    Identify the specific parameters of 
Myth, Geometry and Symbol to contain and to be contained by the Sacred Image.
3    Establish a 
‘Temple’ of experts to propagate this, to enact supportive rituals, and to provide education, security and finance.
4    From a plan specific to the realities of the astronomical 
space-time-continuum, establish the location and orientation of the sacred place with its ‘Idol’ (that is to say something which is, in essence, a geometrical abstraction of That Which Is).
5    At the proper 
time, sanctify and lay out the precinct.
6    Commission the statue from specialist workshop according to the established 
Canon, stating the esoteric cultic aims and purposes, the function, and the form.
7    Design the work which will manifest Abstract Truths.
8    Transfer design via a lay-out grid to the chosen material: (granite, limestone etc).
9    At all stages, sculptors and workers would fast, meditate and act with ritual correctness, as had their Superiors.
10  Apprentices would ‘rough out’ the work, which would be finished by the 
Master.
11  Perform an ‘Opening Of The Mouth Ceremony to ‘activate’ power.
12  Transfer and place ‘Idol’ in its correctly chosen location. Proper ritual and devotions being provided by religious and secular Authorities.

‘Such (Egyptian) sculptures were magical entities, fraught with fateful significance’ (Iverson).

Early Ionian sculptural works were crudely copied Egyptian noble themes. The early Korestatues were very proper to a matrifocal faith.  They were much more Egyptian than the freer Theran murals.

As the problems connected with fitting The Great Ephesian Artemis ‘Idol’ into a space-time continuum widened, so did the opportunities.   Slowly and reluctantly I moved into the dangerous realms of the macro hypothesis

Leave a Reply

© 2011 High Directory. All rights reserved.